in Re Keith M. Jensen

Opinion

In re Keith M. Jensen

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-98-086-CV

IN RE KEITH M. JENSEN

Original Proceeding

OPINION DENYING REHEARING

      In a motion for rehearing, Jensen asks us to invalidate those temporary orders that we did not address in the interlocutory appeal, Cause No. 10-98-093-CV. We decline to do so.

      Unlike an appeal where we can revise or modify orders of a lower court to reflect the “judgment that the court should have entered,” a mandamus proceeding allows us only to direct the judge to comply with our orders. See Tex. R. App. P. 43(c), 52. Thus, Jensen is in the position of asking us to order Judge Altaras to act in a case in which Jensen claims the judge has no authority to act and in which Judge Altaras has already recused himself.

      Jensen is free to ask the currently assigned judge to vacate the remaining temporary orders. We cannot order that judge to do so because he is not before us. See Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex. 1984)(orig. proceeding); Pelt v. Johnson, 818 S.W.2d 212, 215 (Tex. App.—Waco 1991, orig. proceeding).

      Furthermore, the Supreme Court continues to admonish us not to issue writs of mandamus when an adequate remedy by appeal exists. In re Union Pacific Resources Co., 969 S.W.2d 427, 429 (Tex. 1998). We have no reason to believe that the Johnson County proceeding will continue to final judgment. Should it, however, Judge Altaras’ initial decision not to recuse himself may be subject to review on final appeal.

      Finally, orders issued in violation of the recusal rules (as opposed to those issued by a constitutionally-disqualified judge) are voidable, rather than void. See id. at 428.

      Jensen has not demonstrated a clear right to the relief he seeks in this mandamus proceeding. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). The motion for rehearing is denied.

                                                                       BILL VANCE

                                                                       Justice

Before Chief Justice Davis,

          Justice Cummings, and

          Justice Vance

Rehearing denied

Opinion delivered and filed November 12, 1998

Do not publish