In re Keil

Supreme Court of Kansas

In re Keil

855 P.2d 493, 253 Kan. 284, 1993 Kan. LEXIS 133

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 21, 1993

DocketNo. 66,027

StatusPublished

This text of 855 P.2d 493 (In re Keil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Keil, 855 P.2d 493, 253 Kan. 284, 1993 Kan. LEXIS 133 (kan 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

On April 12, 1991, this court placed respondent on probation for two years subject to the following conditions: (1) that his legal practice be supervised by a.member of the Wichita Bar Association’s Impaired Lawyers Assistance Committee; (2) that he remain drug and alcohol free; (3) that he continue to participate in a local Alcoholics Anonymous program; and (4) that he make formal restitution to those injured by his professional misconduct. In re Keil, 248 Kan. 629, 809 P.2d 531 (1991).

This court finds that the Disciplinary Administrator has filed a probation report verifying that respondent has fully complied with all conditions imposed upon him by this court and recommending that respondent be discharged from probation.

It Is Therefore Ordered that respondent is discharged from probation and from any further obligations in this matter and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On April 12, 1991, this court placed respondent on probation for two years subject to the following conditions: (1) that his legal practice be supervised by a.member of the Wichita Bar Association’s Impaired Lawyers Assistance Committee; (2) that he remain drug and alcohol free; (3) that he continue to participate in a local Alcoholics Anonymous program; and (4) that he make formal restitution to those injured by his professional misconduct. In re Keil, 248 Kan. 629, 809 P.2d 531 (1991).

This court finds that the Disciplinary Administrator has filed a probation report verifying that respondent has fully complied with all conditions imposed upon him by this court and recommending that respondent be discharged from probation.

It Is Therefore Ordered that respondent is discharged from probation and from any further obligations in this matter and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

855 P.2d 493, 253 Kan. 284, 1993 Kan. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-keil-kan-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack