In re Kehr

California Supreme Court

In re Kehr

190 Cal. 401

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1923

DocketS. F. No. 10573

StatusPublished

This text of 190 Cal. 401 (In re Kehr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kehr, 190 Cal. 401 (Cal. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner’s remedy is by proceedings in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner’s remedy is by proceedings in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 Cal. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kehr-cal-1923.