In Re Kehr

California Supreme Court

In Re Kehr

212 P. 913, 190 Cal. 401, 1923 Cal. LEXIS 539

California Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1923·No. S. F. No. 10573.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner's remedy is by proceeding in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 402

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to proceed and hear the petition for distribution in this case, where money has been paid to the state treasurer under provisions of section 1737 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is denied, on the ground that petitioner's remedy is by proceeding in the superior court of Sacramento County under the provisions of section 1272a of the Code of Civil Procedure (Stats. 1917, p. 254).

All the Justices concurred.

*Page 402

In Re Kehr, 212 P. 913, 190 Cal. 401, 1923 Cal. LEXIS 539 (Cal. 1923).

Pincite

212 P. 913 (In Re Kehr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related