In re Keene J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Keene J.

253 A.D.2d 679, 677 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9594

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 679 (In re Keene J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Keene J., 253 A.D.2d 679, 677 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrence McElrath, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the Division for Youth, limited secure, for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence from which the court could infer that when appellant struck the complainant in the head, he did so with intent to cause physical injury (Matter of Marcel F., 233 AD2d 442). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Terrence McElrath, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed him with the Division for Youth, limited secure, for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence from which the court could infer that when appellant struck the complainant in the head, he did so with intent to cause physical injury (Matter of Marcel F., 233 AD2d 442). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 679, 677 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-keene-j-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack