In Re Keene

343 So. 2d 916
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1977
Docket76-933
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 343 So. 2d 916 (In Re Keene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Keene, 343 So. 2d 916 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

343 So.2d 916 (1977)

In re Mildred Bass KEENE, W/F Age 75; DOB 7-15-1900.

No. 76-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 11, 1977.

*917 J. Russell Hornsby and James M. Campbell, Orlando, Co-counsel for appellants.

Fred H. Cumbie II of Miles & Cumbie, St. Cloud, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

The trial judge dismissed a Petition for Incompetency upon the filing of a report of the examining committee reporting that the alleged incompetent was indeed competent.

Appellants are daughters of Mildred Bass Keene, the alleged incompetent. They contend the trial court erred in placing too much emphasis upon the report of the examining committee and in not completing the hearing which was held pursuant to Section 744.331(4), Florida Statutes (1975). It is appellants' position that the report of the examining committee is simply evidence to be considered by the trial judge along with other evidence bearing upon the competency of the person involved. For authority supporting that contention, appellants cite Opinion of the Attorney General 050-583. However, Section 394.22(6)(b), Florida Statutes (1950), was the statute in effect at that time and it provided that "the court may without taking any further action terminate the proceedings and dismiss the application." Whereas, the statute controlling these proceedings in pertinent part provides:

"If the report of the examiners is that the alleged incompetent is not mentally or physically incompetent, the court shall dismiss the petition." (Emphasis added.)

Proceedings to determine the competency of a person are generally controlled by statute and where a statute prescribes a certain method of proceeding to make that determination, the statute must be strictly followed. 41 Am.Jur.2d, Incompetent Persons, § 9.

The trial court strictly followed the mandate of the Legislature in dismissing the petition for incompetency and thus did not err in entering the order dismissing appellants' petition which sought to have Mildred Bass Keene declared to be incompetent.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, J., and FOGLE, HARRY W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Cook
260 So. 3d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
JAMES S COOK v. JOHN COOK and ROBERT COOK
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Sarfaty v. in Re: M.S.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Yazdzik v. Scott
129 So. 3d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Jasser v. Saadeh
97 So. 3d 241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Rothman v. Rothman
93 So. 3d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Levine v. Levine
4 So. 3d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Dadic v. Zmetronak
753 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Mathes v. Huelsman
743 So. 2d 626 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
In re Frederick
508 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 So. 2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-keene-fladistctapp-1977.