In re Kazer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kazer

914 A.2d 1289, 189 N.J. 299

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 8, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-233, concluding that MICHAEL C. KAZER [300] of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(e)(improperly providing financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL C. KAZER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-233, concluding that MICHAEL C. KAZER [300] of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(e)(improperly providing financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL C. KAZER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Kazer, 914 A.2d 1289, 189 N.J. 299 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

914 A.2d 1289 (In re Kazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.