In re Kayshawna D.
This text of 59 A.D.3d 619 (In re Kayshawna D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In eight related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother and father separately appeal from stated portions of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hamill, J.), dated December 11, 2007.
Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The order of disposition which is the subject of this appeal expired by its own terms on December 9, 2008. Accordingly, the appeals must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Jordan E., 57 AD3d 539 [2008]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]; Matter of Mary Veronica R., 10 AD3d 400 [2004]; Matter of Alan B., 267 AD2d 306 [1999]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Eng, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 A.D.3d 619, 872 N.Y.S.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kayshawna-d-nyappdiv-2009.