In re Kayla B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kayla B.

262 A.D.2d 137, 690 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 137 (In re Kayla B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kayla B., 262 A.D.2d 137, 690 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about August 18, 1998, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the neglect petition against respondents Cheraya G. and Reginald C., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Based on the hearing evidence, Family Court’s findings, that the violent domestic incident between respondent mother and her boyfriend had been an isolated episode, and that the incident was, by itself, insufficient to sustain the neglect petition, were proper. Petitioner did not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the children had been placed in danger of impairment as a result of respondent mother’s conduct (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about August 18, 1998, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the neglect petition against respondents Cheraya G. and Reginald C., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Based on the hearing evidence, Family Court’s findings, that the violent domestic incident between respondent mother and her boyfriend had been an isolated episode, and that the incident was, by itself, insufficient to sustain the neglect petition, were proper. Petitioner did not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the children had been placed in danger of impairment as a result of respondent mother’s conduct (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 137, 690 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kayla-b-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack