In re Kavesh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kavesh

247 A.D. 175, 286 N.Y.S. 590, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8209

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1936·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The failure to comply with section 142 of the Election Law by petitioner-respondent in filing objections and proper specifications to the designating petitions, in so far as such objections appear on the face of the petition, precludes a review [176] because of such failure of compliance. The record does not contain any proof upon which the court in the exercise of its summary jurisdiction might find the designating petitions defective.

On the state of the record, the order should be reversed in so far as appealed from and the petition denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed and petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The failure to comply with section 142 of the Election Law by petitioner-respondent in filing objections and proper specifications to the designating petitions, in so far as such objections appear on the face of the petition, precludes a review [176] because of such failure of compliance. The record does not contain any proof upon which the court in the exercise of its summary jurisdiction might find the designating petitions defective.

On the state of the record, the order should be reversed in so far as appealed from and the petition denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from unanimously reversed and petition denied.

In re Kavesh, 247 A.D. 175, 286 N.Y.S. 590, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 175 (In re Kavesh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related