In re Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kaufmann

195 A.D. 830, 187 N.Y.S. 213, 1921 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4842

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1921·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, ter,m of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim (195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he , must be disbarred.

Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, ter,m of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim (195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he , must be disbarred.

Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred. Settle order on notice.

In re Kaufmann, 195 A.D. 830, 187 N.Y.S. 213, 1921 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

195 A.D. 830 (In re Kaufmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related