In re Kaufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kaufman

45 A.D.2d 468, 359 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 468 (In re Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kaufman, 45 A.D.2d 468, 359 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, admitted to practice in the Second Department in 1948, was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree by a jury. He thereafter pleaded guilty to a second indictment charging grand larceny in the second degree. On each indictment he was sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, with a maximum of three years. The petitioner, Association of the Bar, moves that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys. Respondent concedes that any opposition to the petition would be meaningless pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law.

The motion is accordingly granted.

Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name.struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent, admitted to practice in the Second Department in 1948, was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree by a jury. He thereafter pleaded guilty to a second indictment charging grand larceny in the second degree. On each indictment he was sentenced to an indeterminate sentence, with a maximum of three years. The petitioner, Association of the Bar, moves that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys. Respondent concedes that any opposition to the petition would be meaningless pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law.

The motion is accordingly granted.

Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name.struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 468, 359 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaufman-nyappdiv-1974.