In re Kauffman

55 A.D.2d 526, 389 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15166
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about August 25, 1976, insofar as it denied the petitioners’ request for the appointment of Etta Snitzer as coconservator and appointed H.O.N. Frankel, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, the appointment of Frankel vacated, and Etta Snitzer appointed coconservator with the petitioner Gladys Kauffman, the coconservators to serve without compensation. Absent a demonstrable conflict of interest or objection (cf. Matter of Gorman, 77 Misc 2d 564), it was "an improvident exercise of discretion not to accede to the wishes and concerns of those most closely affiliated with the incompetent” (Matter of Younker, 42 AD2d 534). Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Capozzoli, Lane, Nunez and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kauffman, 55 A.D.2d 526, 389 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

55 A.D.2d 526 (In re Kauffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Penning
930 A.2d 144 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
In Re Orshansky
804 A.2d 1077 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2002)