In re Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katz

211 A.D.2d 134, 627 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 134 (In re Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katz, 211 A.D.2d 134, 627 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 7, 1986 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. He states in his affidavit that, at the time of his admission, he resided in the greater metropolitan area of Kansas City, Missouri, that he is admitted to practice in the [135]*135States of Missouri and Kansas, that he has not been employed as an attorney in New York State since his admission, and that he does not intend to practice law in New York State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 7, 1986 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. He states in his affidavit that, at the time of his admission, he resided in the greater metropolitan area of Kansas City, Missouri, that he is admitted to practice in the [135]*135States of Missouri and Kansas, that he has not been employed as an attorney in New York State since his admission, and that he does not intend to practice law in New York State. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 134, 627 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katz-nyappdiv-1995.