In re Katz

135 A.D.2d 206, 525 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191

This text of 135 A.D.2d 206 (In re Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Katz, 135 A.D.2d 206, 525 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on July 29,1981.

[207]*207On October 27,1987, in the County Court, Rockland County, the respondent was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony, grand larceny in the third degree, a class D felony (14 counts), forgery in the second degree, a class D felony, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, a class E felony, upon his plea of guilty.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A.D.2d 206, 525 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katz-nyappdiv-1988.