In re Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katz

67 A.D.2d 36, 414 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10072

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 36 (In re Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katz, 67 A.D.2d 36, 414 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 25, 1976 in the Second Judicial Department. On January 25, 1979, he was convicted in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of receipt of stolen securities (US Code, tit 18, § 2315) and conspiracy to violate that section as well as [37]*37section 659 of title 18 of the United States Code in violation of section 371 of title 18 of the United States Code. Both crimes of which defendant was convicted are felonies under Federal law. Accordingly, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York upon such conviction (Matter of Thies, 45 NY2d 865).

Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law.

Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Silverman and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 25, 1976 in the Second Judicial Department. On January 25, 1979, he was convicted in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of receipt of stolen securities (US Code, tit 18, § 2315) and conspiracy to violate that section as well as [37]*37section 659 of title 18 of the United States Code in violation of section 371 of title 18 of the United States Code. Both crimes of which defendant was convicted are felonies under Federal law. Accordingly, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York upon such conviction (Matter of Thies, 45 NY2d 865).

Respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law.

Birns, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Silverman and Bloom, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 36, 414 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katz-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack