In re Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katz

64 A.D.2d 973, 409 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 973 (In re Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katz, 64 A.D.2d 973, 409 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by petitioner, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the grounds that on March 16, 1978 he was convicted on his plea of guilty to the felony of grand larceny in the second degree (three counts) in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Motion granted. Accordingly, by virtue of the statute (Judiciary Law, §90, subd 4) said Harvey Katz admitted to practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, on December 16, 1963 has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by petitioner, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the grounds that on March 16, 1978 he was convicted on his plea of guilty to the felony of grand larceny in the second degree (three counts) in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Motion granted. Accordingly, by virtue of the statute (Judiciary Law, §90, subd 4) said Harvey Katz admitted to practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, on December 16, 1963 has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 973, 409 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katz-nyappdiv-1978.