In re Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Katz

261 A.D. 867, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 867 (In re Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Katz, 261 A.D. 867, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent Herman L. Katz is disbarred from the date of the entry and service of a certified copy of the order to that effect to be entered hereon, and said respondent Herman L. Katz is hereby commanded hereafter to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, and is hereby forbidden to perform any of the following acts for compensation or reward, to wit: 1. To practice as an attorney or counselor at law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority. 2. To give to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto. The court approves of the findings of fact of the referee herein, and determines that the respondent Herman °L. Katz is guilty of professional misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent Herman L. Katz is disbarred from the date of the entry and service of a certified copy of the order to that effect to be entered hereon, and said respondent Herman L. Katz is hereby commanded hereafter to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, and is hereby forbidden to perform any of the following acts for compensation or reward, to wit: 1. To practice as an attorney or counselor at law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority. 2. To give to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto. The court approves of the findings of fact of the referee herein, and determines that the respondent Herman °L. Katz is guilty of professional misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 867, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katz-nyappdiv-1941.