in Re: Katy Engineer
This text of in Re: Katy Engineer (in Re: Katy Engineer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00746-CV
IN RE KATY ENGINEER, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On August 30, 2006, relator Katy Engineer filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, seeking relief from a divorce decree signed by respondent, the Honorable Robert J. Kern, presiding judge of the 387th Judicial District Court, Fort Bend County, on remand from this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator argues that the decree after remand does not accurately reflect this court=s opinion, dated January 31, 2006, and is, therefore, an abuse of discretion. See In re Castle Tex. Prod. Ltd. P=ship, 157 S.W.3d 524, 527 (Tex. App.CTyler 2005, orig. proceeding) (AA trial court=s failure or refusal to comply with a court of appeals mandate is an abuse of discretion.@).
After examining the matter, we conclude that relator has failed to establish the trial court abused its discretion. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Katy Engineer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katy-engineer-texapp-2006.