in Re Katrina Kohleffel
This text of in Re Katrina Kohleffel (in Re Katrina Kohleffel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00509-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE KATRINA KOHLEFFEL
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
On October 21, 2022, relator Katrina Kohleffel filed a petition for writ of mandamus
contending that the trial court abused its discretion by transferring a contested probate
proceeding to the district court after relator filed a motion requesting the appointment of
a statutory probate court judge. See generally TEX. EST. CODE ANN. § 32.003.
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Cody Kohleffel and Cordale
Kohleffel, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days
from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 27th day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Katrina Kohleffel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katrina-kohleffel-texapp-2022.