In re Kathryn P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kathryn P.

225 A.D.2d 1064, 639 N.Y.2d 606, 639 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 1064 (In re Kathryn P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kathryn P., 225 A.D.2d 1064, 639 N.Y.2d 606, 639 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petition terminating the parental rights of respondent based upon her permanent neglect of her four children. Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that respondent’s alcoholism and mental illness had resulted in respondent’s failure to maintain contact with the children or plan for their future (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of St. Vincent’s Servs. [Joseph Bernard H.] v Jean H., 211 AD2d 799, 800, lv denied 85 NY2d 811). Although two of the children are living with their father and there is no evidence that adoption is contemplated for them, the record nevertheless supports the [1065]*1065court’s finding that termination of respondent’s parental rights is in their best interests (see, Family Ct Act § 623).

In light of respondent’s disruptive behavior at the dispositional hearing, the court did not err in completing the hearing in respondent’s absence (see, Matter of Victoria B., 185 AD2d 811, 812). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petition terminating the parental rights of respondent based upon her permanent neglect of her four children. Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that respondent’s alcoholism and mental illness had resulted in respondent’s failure to maintain contact with the children or plan for their future (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of St. Vincent’s Servs. [Joseph Bernard H.] v Jean H., 211 AD2d 799, 800, lv denied 85 NY2d 811). Although two of the children are living with their father and there is no evidence that adoption is contemplated for them, the record nevertheless supports the [1065]*1065court’s finding that termination of respondent’s parental rights is in their best interests (see, Family Ct Act § 623).

In light of respondent’s disruptive behavior at the dispositional hearing, the court did not err in completing the hearing in respondent’s absence (see, Matter of Victoria B., 185 AD2d 811, 812). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D.2d 1064, 639 N.Y.2d 606, 639 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kathryn-p-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack