in Re Kathleen Penrod

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 22, 2009
Docket14-09-00776-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Kathleen Penrod (in Re Kathleen Penrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Kathleen Penrod, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-09-00776-CV

IN RE KATHLEEN PENROD, Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            On September 10, 2009, relator, Kathleen Penrod, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Tony Lindsay, presiding judge of the 280th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her September 2, 2009 orders striking Shelly Penrod’s petition in intervention, and excluding the testimony of relator’s expert witnesses, David S. Komm, Richard N. Hinrichs, and Richard C. Vanglish.

            Relator has not established her entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.  Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.  We further lift the stay issued on September 11, 2009.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Brown. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Kathleen Penrod, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kathleen-penrod-texapp-2009.