In Re: Katakis
This text of In Re: Katakis (In Re: Katakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: HELEN KATAKIS, Appellant ______________________
2016-1695 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 85901018. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
HENRY JOSEPH CITTONE, Cittone & Chinta LLP, New York, NY, and GREGORY DOLIN, University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellant.
MARY BETH WALKER, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Pa- tent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KARUSE, CHRISTINA HIEBER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Katakis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-katakis-cafc-2017.