In re Karnofel

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Karnofel

921 N.E.2d 1070, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1486

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 921 N.E.2d 1070 (In re Karnofel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Karnofel, 921 N.E.2d 1070, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

On February 10, 2010, this court found Delores M. Karnofel to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Karnofel was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On February 17, 2010 and February 19, 2010, Karnofel submitted motions for leave to proceed. Upon review of the proffered documents, the court finds them without merit. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Delores M. Karnofel’s motions for leave are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On February 10, 2010, this court found Delores M. Karnofel to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Karnofel was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On February 17, 2010 and February 19, 2010, Karnofel submitted motions for leave to proceed. Upon review of the proffered documents, the court finds them without merit. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Delores M. Karnofel’s motions for leave are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 N.E.2d 1070, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-karnofel-ohio-2010.