In Re Karl Keene v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Karl Keene v. the State of Texas (In Re Karl Keene v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 7, 2024
No. 04-24-00037-CR
IN RE Karl KEENE, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
On January 19, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought.2 Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on February 7, 2024.
_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of February, 2024.
_____________________________ Tommy Stolhandske, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Case No. 115928, styled State of Texas vs. Karl Keene, pending in the 437th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Joel Perez presiding. 2 The petition also contains allegations and requests for relief that could be deemed an application for a writ of habeas corpus. This court has no jurisdiction to consider the application or to grant the requested relief. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. arts. 11.07, 11.08.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Karl Keene v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-karl-keene-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.