In re Kargbo

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Kargbo

186 A.3d 1242

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 2018

DocketNo. 18–BG–61

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.3d 1242 (In re Kargbo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kargbo, 186 A.3d 1242 (D.C. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland that placed respondent on inactive status due to a disability, this court's February 28, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing her to show cause why the functional equivalent of a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 should not be imposed, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response to the court's order or a D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Mariatu Kargbo is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 (g) for reinstatement, as well as D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Rule XI § 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with *1243D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland that placed respondent on inactive status due to a disability, this court's February 28, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing her to show cause why the functional equivalent of a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 should not be imposed, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has not filed a response to the court's order or a D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Mariatu Kargbo is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 (g) for reinstatement, as well as D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Rule XI § 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with *1243D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.3d 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kargbo-dc-2018.