In re Karen B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Karen B.

44 A.D.2d 567, 353 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 44 A.D.2d 567 (In re Karen B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Karen B., 44 A.D.2d 567, 353 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In two juvenile delinquency proceedings, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered May 29, 1973, which, after fact-finding determinations in the two proceedings, placed appellant on probation. Order and the two fact-finding determinations reversed, on the law, without costs, and new fact-finding hearings ordered. The record does not show that appellant and her parent were advised of appellant’s right to remain silent at the commencement of the fact-finding hearing (Family Ct. Act, § 741). Neither does it show that she was questioned by the Family Court as to any of the facts contained in the petition, that she herself admitted to any of said facts, or, if she did, that she and her parent were properly advised of the consequences of such an admission. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two juvenile delinquency proceedings, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered May 29, 1973, which, after fact-finding determinations in the two proceedings, placed appellant on probation. Order and the two fact-finding determinations reversed, on the law, without costs, and new fact-finding hearings ordered. The record does not show that appellant and her parent were advised of appellant’s right to remain silent at the commencement of the fact-finding hearing (Family Ct. Act, § 741). Neither does it show that she was questioned by the Family Court as to any of the facts contained in the petition, that she herself admitted to any of said facts, or, if she did, that she and her parent were properly advised of the consequences of such an admission. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 567, 353 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-karen-b-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack