IN RE: KAREN A. CACO
This text of 144 A.3d 40 (IN RE: KAREN A. CACO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certifiéd order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for a period of one year, this court’s June 3,2016, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functionally-equivalent reciprocal discipline of a one year suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, the statement , of respondent wherein she consents to the imposition of reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on June 30, 2016, it is
ORDERED that Karen A. Caco is hereby suspended from the practice" of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year nunc pro .tunc to June 30, 2016. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 A.3d 40, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 300, 2016 WL 4182515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-karen-a-caco-dc-2016.