In re: Kareem Currence
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1498
In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-ct-03038-BO)
Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that a United
States Magistrate Judge has unduly delayed his civil rights action, and he seeks an order
from this court directing the judge to act. The present record reveals no undue delay in
the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the
mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re: Kareem Currence (In re: Kareem Currence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.