In re: Kareem Currence

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2018·No. 18-1498·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1498

In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-ct-03038-BO)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that a United

States Magistrate Judge has unduly delayed his civil rights action, and he seeks an order

from this court directing the judge to act. The present record reveals no undue delay in

the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Kareem Currence, (4th Cir. 2018).

In re: Kareem Currence (In re: Kareem Currence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.