In re Kareem C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kareem C.

253 A.D.2d 708, 678 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 708 (In re Kareem C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kareem C., 253 A.D.2d 708, 678 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about August 15, 1995, which, upon a finding of neglect, placed three of the subject children in the custody of petitioner Commissioner of Social Services for 12 months and the fourth child in the custody of his paternal grandmother for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of evidence that respondent failed to avail himself of the drug rehabilitation and other programs to which he had been repeatedly referred by petitioner, and to provide adequate food, shelter and clothing for the children (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [a] [iii]; see, Matter of Selathia Nicole F., 243 AD2d 400, lv denied 91 NY2d 806; Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. [Dante M.] v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73, 80). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about August 15, 1995, which, upon a finding of neglect, placed three of the subject children in the custody of petitioner Commissioner of Social Services for 12 months and the fourth child in the custody of his paternal grandmother for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of evidence that respondent failed to avail himself of the drug rehabilitation and other programs to which he had been repeatedly referred by petitioner, and to provide adequate food, shelter and clothing for the children (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; § 1046 [a] [iii]; see, Matter of Selathia Nicole F., 243 AD2d 400, lv denied 91 NY2d 806; Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. [Dante M.] v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73, 80). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 708, 678 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kareem-c-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack