In re Karasick
This text of 781 A.2d 48 (In re Karasick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-166, concluding that IRA KARASICK of MONTCLAIR, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of fee) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that IRA KARASICK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
781 A.2d 48, 169 N.J. 570, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-karasick-nj-2001.