In re Kapur

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kapur

914 A.2d 829, 189 N.J. 193, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 10

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 11, 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-242, concluding that DREW K. KAPUR of HAMILTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b)(criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DREW K. KAPUR is hereby censured; and it is further

[194] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-242, concluding that DREW K. KAPUR of HAMILTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b)(criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DREW K. KAPUR is hereby censured; and it is further

[194] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Kapur, 914 A.2d 829, 189 N.J. 193, 2007 N.J. LEXIS 10 (N.J. 2007).

Pincite

914 A.2d 829 (In re Kapur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.