In re Kaplan

10 A.D.2d 909, 202 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Kaplan. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 A.D.2d 231

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. The execution and enforcement of the order appealed from is hereby stayed until 10 days after service of a copy of the order entered herein upon the attorney for the respondemLappellant, with notice of entry thereof. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin and M. M. Frank, JJ.; Valente and Stevens, JJ., dissent and vote to deny in the following memorandum: We dissent and vote to deny motion for order of arrest on the ground that whatever materiality the inquiry would have had if timely made was destroyed. by the unexplained lapse of time, and, under all the circumstances, there was reasonable ground to refuse to answer the questions put. [22 Misc 2d 839.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kaplan, 10 A.D.2d 909, 202 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 909 (In re Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Kaplan
22 Misc. 2d 839 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)