in Re: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation and Leticia Ventura
This text of in Re: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation and Leticia Ventura (in Re: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation and Leticia Ventura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-617-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION
AND LETICIA VENTURA
________________________________________________ _________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relators, Kaplan Higher Education Corporation and Leticia Ventura, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on September 29, 2005. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the response filed by real parties in interest,[2] relators' reply, real parties' surreply, the record, and the supplemental record, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, the temporary stay granted on November 22, 2005, is lifted.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 10th day of January, 2006.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
[2]The real parties in interest are the plaintiffs below. They include Luis Rios, Ricardo Arguello, Jesus A. Barraza, Luis A. Briceno, Jorge L. Carpio, Arturo Casas, Hector de la Fuente, Johnny de la Rosa, Sergio F. Del Angel, Israel Esquivel, Gilberto Garcia, Ismael Garcia, Javier Garcia, Jr., Santos Garza, Pedro Garza, Jr., Jesus E. Gonzalez, Rudy Guajardo, Noel J. Hernandez, Eric Hernandez, Arturo Longoria, Raul Madrigal, Antonio Martinez, Jose M. Moya, Miguel Orocio, Jr., Jorge L. Perez, Rafael Perez, Edgar Quiroga, Juan Rodriguez, Martin Salinas, Jesus G. Solis, Isidro Venecia, Jr., Juan Carlos "Charlie" Garcia, Torribio Cortina, III, Antero Villanueva, Albert Munoz, Jr., Jose R. Alanis, Alfredo Zepeda, Jr., Ruben Morales, Jose Ponce, Jr., Mario Moreno, Samuel Rodriguez, Jr., Juan Jose Rodriguez, Jacob Molina, Roberto Cazares, and Ricardo Garcia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation and Leticia Ventura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaplan-higher-education-corporation-and-leti-texapp-2006.