In re Kantor

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Kantor

680 N.E.2d 955, 79 Ohio St. 3d 167

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 18, 1997

DocketNo. 97-413

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 680 N.E.2d 955 (In re Kantor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kantor, 680 N.E.2d 955, 79 Ohio St. 3d 167 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We accept the board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Applicant is hereby authorized to reapply for authorization to take the July 1997 bar examination. Costs of these proceedings are taxed to the applicant.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would require applicant to wait and reapply for the July 1998 bar examination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We accept the board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Applicant is hereby authorized to reapply for authorization to take the July 1997 bar examination. Costs of these proceedings are taxed to the applicant.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would require applicant to wait and reapply for the July 1998 bar examination.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 N.E.2d 955, 79 Ohio St. 3d 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kantor-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack