In re Kanouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kanouse

191 A.D.2d 149, 601 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on March 7, 1975 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Florida where he presently practices law, that he has no intention of returning to New York and that there are no [150]*150complaints pending against him. Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on March 7, 1975 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Florida where he presently practices law, that he has no intention of returning to New York and that there are no [150]*150complaints pending against him. Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

In re Kanouse, 191 A.D.2d 149, 601 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

191 A.D.2d 149 (In re Kanouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.