In re Kang

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Kang

886 A.2d 681

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 29, 2005

DocketNo. 111 DB 2005 (No. 50 RST 2005)

StatusPublished

This text of 886 A.2d 681 (In re Kang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kang, 886 A.2d 681 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 21, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that MARY PATRICIA KANG, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 21, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that MARY PATRICIA KANG, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 A.2d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kang-pa-2005.