In re Kane's Estate

159 N.Y.S. 992
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided June 19, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOWLER, S.

The executor has filed his account and asks the surrogate to construe the following paragraph of the will of testatrix:

“Third. The balance of my estate, consisting of my bank accounts, trunks and other personal effects, should be equally divided, share and share alike, between my relatives.”

As there is nothing in the other provisions of the will which would indicate that the testatrix intended to limit participation in her personal estate to any particular relatives, the property mentioned in the above paragraph should be divided equally among the persons who, under the statute of distribution of this state, would be entitled to a distributive share of her personal estate. Ennis v. Pentz, 3 Bradf. 382; Gallagher v. Crooks, 132 N. Y. 338, 30 N. E. 746.

Submit decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kane's Estate, 159 N.Y.S. 992 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1916).

159 N.Y.S. 992 (In re Kane's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Casey
149 Misc. 2d 537 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1990)