In re Kane
This text of 56 A.3d 865 (In re Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-120, concluding that THOMAS KANE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, [477]*477should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(g) (threatening criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that THOMAS KANE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.3d 865, 212 N.J. 476, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kane-nj-2012.