In re Kane

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kane

56 A.3d 865, 212 N.J. 476, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1260

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 6, 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-120, concluding that THOMAS KANE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, [477] should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(g) (threatening criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS KANE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-120, concluding that THOMAS KANE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, [477] should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.4(g) (threatening criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS KANE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Kane, 56 A.3d 865, 212 N.J. 476, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1260 (N.J. 2012).

Pincite

56 A.3d 865 (In re Kane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.