In re Kane

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kane

838 A.2d 463, 178 N.J. 258

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 14, 2004

DocketATTORNEY NO. 048711988

StatusPublished

This text of 838 A.2d 463 (In re Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kane, 838 A.2d 463, 178 N.J. 258 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-183, concluding that HARRY J. KANE, JR., of DENVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HARRY J. KANE, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-183, concluding that HARRY J. KANE, JR., of DENVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to communicate) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HARRY J. KANE, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 A.2d 463, 178 N.J. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kane-nj-2004.