In re Kandi C.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

In re Kandi C.

518 A.2d 121, 1986 Me. LEXIS 930

DecidedDecember 2, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 518 A.2d 121 (In re Kandi C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kandi C., 518 A.2d 121, 1986 Me. LEXIS 930 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Karen C. appeals from a judgment of the District Court, Skowhegan, terminating her parental rights to two of her children. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055 (Supp.1985). She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination. Examining the evidence in a light most favorable to the Department of Human Services, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to persuade the factfinder that the statutory requirements were proven to a high probability. See In re Crystal S., 483 A.2d 1210, 1213 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Karen C. appeals from a judgment of the District Court, Skowhegan, terminating her parental rights to two of her children. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055 (Supp.1985). She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support termination. Examining the evidence in a light most favorable to the Department of Human Services, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to persuade the factfinder that the statutory requirements were proven to a high probability. See In re Crystal S., 483 A.2d 1210, 1213 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 A.2d 121, 1986 Me. LEXIS 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kandi-c-me-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack