In re Kamp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kamp

255 A.D. 707, 5 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1938·Published

Opinion

Prom a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, awarding to the petitioners-respondents one-half of a share of the capital stock of Gasau & Kamp, Inc., the appellant appeals. [708]*708Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Although the letter (Petitioners’ Exhibit 5) was inadmissible as hearsay (Bookman v. Stegman, 105 N. Y. 621), the decree is fully sustained by the presumption that the partnership was upon an equal basis (Ryder v. Gilbert, 16 Hun, 163) and the fact that the entire assets of the partnership were transferred to the corporation in exchange for all of its capital stock. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prom a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, awarding to the petitioners-respondents one-half of a share of the capital stock of Gasau & Kamp, Inc., the appellant appeals. [708]*708Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Although the letter (Petitioners’ Exhibit 5) was inadmissible as hearsay (Bookman v. Stegman, 105 N. Y. 621), the decree is fully sustained by the presumption that the partnership was upon an equal basis (Ryder v. Gilbert, 16 Hun, 163) and the fact that the entire assets of the partnership were transferred to the corporation in exchange for all of its capital stock. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

In re Kamp, 255 A.D. 707, 5 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 707 (In re Kamp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related