In re Kamp

255 A.D. 707, 5 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869

This text of 255 A.D. 707 (In re Kamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kamp, 255 A.D. 707, 5 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Prom a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, awarding to the petitioners-respondents one-half of a share of the capital stock of Gasau & Kamp, Inc., the appellant appeals. [708]*708Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate. Although the letter (Petitioners’ Exhibit 5) was inadmissible as hearsay (Bookman v. Stegman, 105 N. Y. 621), the decree is fully sustained by the presumption that the partnership was upon an equal basis (Ryder v. Gilbert, 16 Hun, 163) and the fact that the entire assets of the partnership were transferred to the corporation in exchange for all of its capital stock. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bookman v. . Stegman
105 N.Y. 621 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 707, 5 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kamp-nyappdiv-1938.