In re Kaminsky
253 A.D. 925, 2 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Kaminsky. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D. 132 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 1938·Published
Opinion
Motion for a stay pending appeal denied, without costs. The order appealed from was discretionary in character and we find no sufficient reason for staying its execution pending appeal. Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Kaminsky, 253 A.D. 925, 2 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
253 A.D. 925 (In re Kaminsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.