In re Kaminsky
253 A.D. 925, 2 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9288
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 1938
StatusPublished
This text of 253 A.D. 925 (In re Kaminsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Kaminsky, 253 A.D. 925, 2 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
Opinion
Motion for a stay pending appeal denied, without costs. The order appealed from was discretionary in character and we find no sufficient reason for staying its execution pending appeal. Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 925, 2 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaminsky-nyappdiv-1938.