In Re Kaminsky

39 A.3d 905, 209 N.J. 598, 2012 WL 1129953, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 4, 2012·No. M-1193 September Term 2011, D-67 September Term 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the. motion of JERROLD N. KAMINSKY, who was admitted to the bar of this state in 1977, seeking to stay the effective date of the Order of three-month suspension filed by the Court on March 9, 2012, and effective April 9, 2012;

And good cause appearing;

*599 It is ORDERED that the motion to stay the effective date of the suspension is granted, pending the Court’s consideration of respondent’s petition for review of the decision of the Disciplinary Review Board in DRB 11-257 and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JERROLD N. KAMINSKY file and serve his petition for review of the Disciplinary Review Board decision in DRB 11-267 within twenty-one days after the filing date of this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Kaminsky, 39 A.3d 905, 209 N.J. 598, 2012 WL 1129953, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 376 (N.J. 2012).

39 A.3d 905 (In Re Kaminsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Becker
39 A.3d 905 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)