In re Kakoullis
242 A.D.2d 461, 663 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 1997·Published
Opinion
The motion insofar as it seeks reargument is granted, and upon reargument, the motion is granted only to the extent that the sanction of disbarment is made retroactive to respondent’s interim suspension of March 3, 1994; the motion insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied. No opinion. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Kakoullis, 242 A.D.2d 461, 663 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).
242 A.D.2d 461 (In re Kakoullis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.