In re Kailas

184 So. 3d 684, 2016 La. LEXIS 222, 2016 WL 687245
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 19, 2016
DocketNo. 2015-B-2261
StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 3d 684 (In re Kailas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Kailas, 184 So. 3d 684, 2016 La. LEXIS 222, 2016 WL 687245 (La. 2016).

Opinion

JjATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated Rule 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Naveen Raj Kailas, Louisiana Bar Roll number 34228, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 So. 3d 684, 2016 La. LEXIS 222, 2016 WL 687245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kailas-la-2016.