In re Kaigh

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Kaigh

171 A.3d 198, 231 N.J. 7

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 5, 2017

DocketD–121 Sept. Term 2016; 079180

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.3d 198 (In re Kaigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kaigh, 171 A.3d 198, 231 N.J. 7 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-282, concluding that JAIME MERRICK

**8KAIGHof WESTMONT,who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter or to promptly reply to reasonable requests for information), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAIME MERRICK KAIGHis hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further *199ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-282, concluding that JAIME MERRICK

**8KAIGHof WESTMONT,who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter or to promptly reply to reasonable requests for information), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to respond to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAIME MERRICK KAIGHis hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further *199ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.3d 198, 231 N.J. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaigh-nj-2017.