In re Kaeem R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Kaeem R.

268 A.D.2d 372, 700 N.Y.S.2d 827, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 372 (In re Kaeem R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kaeem R., 268 A.D.2d 372, 700 N.Y.S.2d 827, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposi[373]*373tian, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about August 10, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, unlawful possession of weapons by a person under sixteen and attempted unlawful possession of weapons by a person under sixteen, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposi[373]*373tian, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about August 10, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, unlawful possession of weapons by a person under sixteen and attempted unlawful possession of weapons by a person under sixteen, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 372, 700 N.Y.S.2d 827, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaeem-r-nyappdiv-2000.