In re Kaeding

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Kaeding

208 Ill. 2d 565

DecidedMarch 15, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. 2d 565 (In re Kaeding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Kaeding, 208 Ill. 2d 565 (Ill. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

)rder of the Court:

The amended petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Robert Howard Kaeding is suspended from the practice of law for 90 days. Respondent Robert Howard Kaeding shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

)rder of the Court:

The amended petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Robert Howard Kaeding is suspended from the practice of law for 90 days. Respondent Robert Howard Kaeding shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 Ill. 2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kaeding-ill-2004.