In re Kadeem W.
This text of 842 N.E.2d 15 (In re Kadeem W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
While not overwhelming, there was legally sufficient evidence to hold Kadeem W. responsible as an accessory for Takim N.’s conduct; therefore, the Appellate Division erred in reversing Family Court’s determination for legal insufficiency. We remit the case to the Appellate Division for consideration of the facts, specifically including its weight-of-the-evidence review, and other issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
842 N.E.2d 15, 5 N.Y.3d 864, 808 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2005 NY Slip Op 8848, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-kadeem-w-ny-2005.