Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re Kadeem W.

In re Kadeem W.

842 N.E.2d 15, 5 N.Y.3d 864, 808 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2005 NY Slip Op 8848, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3219
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2005·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

While not overwhelming, there was legally sufficient evidence to hold Kadeem W. responsible as an accessory for Takim N.’s conduct; therefore, the Appellate Division erred in reversing Family Court’s determination for legal insufficiency. We remit the case to the Appellate Division for consideration of the facts, specifically including its weight-of-the-evidence review, and other issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Kadeem W., 842 N.E.2d 15, 5 N.Y.3d 864, 808 N.Y.S.2d 130, 2005 NY Slip Op 8848, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3219 (N.Y. 2005).

842 N.E.2d 15 (In re Kadeem W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mann v. Mezuyon, LLC
New York Court of Appeals, 2026
P., CHARLES, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
In re Charles P.
133 A.D.3d 1244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Monos v. Monos
123 A.D.3d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Smith
87 A.D.3d 1169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Robert C.
67 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Ramos
59 A.D.3d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Robert A.
57 A.D.3d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re India G.
40 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Malcolm G.
38 A.D.3d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Vaughn
36 A.D.3d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Kadeem W.
31 A.D.3d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Dan H.
26 A.D.3d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)