In re K

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re K

163 A.D.2d 163, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8454

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D.2d 163 (In re K) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re K, 163 A.D.2d 163, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, wherein it seeks reargument, granted only to extent of (1) substituting the figure "46” for "51” (days) appearing in line 5 of second full paragraph on page 2 of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order entered on April 12, 1990 (160 AD2d 338, 339), and (2) deleting the last full paragraph of the memorandum decision (supra, at 340). Motion denied in all other respects. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, wherein it seeks reargument, granted only to extent of (1) substituting the figure "46” for "51” (days) appearing in line 5 of second full paragraph on page 2 of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order entered on April 12, 1990 (160 AD2d 338, 339), and (2) deleting the last full paragraph of the memorandum decision (supra, at 340). Motion denied in all other respects. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D.2d 163, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-k-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack