In re K

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re K

163 A.D.2d 163, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8454

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 10, 1990·Published

Opinion

Motion, wherein it seeks reargument, granted only to extent of (1) substituting the figure "46” for "51” (days) appearing in line 5 of second full paragraph on page 2 of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order entered on April 12, 1990 (160 AD2d 338, 339), and (2) deleting the last full paragraph of the memorandum decision (supra, at 340). Motion denied in all other respects. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, wherein it seeks reargument, granted only to extent of (1) substituting the figure "46” for "51” (days) appearing in line 5 of second full paragraph on page 2 of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order entered on April 12, 1990 (160 AD2d 338, 339), and (2) deleting the last full paragraph of the memorandum decision (supra, at 340). Motion denied in all other respects. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

In re K, 163 A.D.2d 163, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

163 A.D.2d 163 (In re K) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related